2019 Ford Ranger Gasoline V6 Engine Review & Changes – The 2019 Ford Ranger is establishing with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost inline-four, a turbocharged engine with quite balanced specs in the Mustang and Focus RS. The new Ranger’s direct opponent, the Chevrolet Colorado, gives three engine possibilities. Thinking of the one-upsmanship struggle raging concerning the brand new 2019 Silverado 1500 (and its nevertheless unexplainable Duramax inline-six diesel engine) and the F-150’s new diesel V6, perform not consider Ford is departing matters there. There are a handful of engines that can come across their way under the hood of the Ranger. Allow us to cover them in convert.
The Ford Transit presents the Power Stroke 3.2-liter engine reinforced up with a six-speed automatic in the United States, which is sold as a Duratorq in other elements of the world. It’s an inline-five, turbocharged diesel engine that provides 185 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque. In the Transit, it gives terrific payload and towing quantities: 3,280 lbs and 4,800 lbs, correspondingly. The EPA won’t listing fuel economy quantities for this vehicle. The most robust case for the 3.2 is that it’s in fact equipped previously in global Rangers as the top-puppy engine preference for some marketplaces. Considering that the U.S. Ranger is mainly equivalent to the global Ranger, it’s going to, in theory, bolt proper up.
Allow us to suppose that the 3.2’s output numbers could well be unaffected in the Ranger. With a Power Stroke 3.2 under the hood, the Ranger will be really shut to the Chevy Colorado’s available 2.8-liter Duramax turbodiesel I-4. The Duramax will make 181 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque. Thinking of the Power Stroke’s larger displacement and greater cylinder depend, there may be some room to modify the track to beat the Duramax, but it’s shut ample that Ford ought not to be humiliated possibly way. We now have assessed this engine in the Transit on our first drive review back in 2019.
Ford just debuted a further light-duty (that is to say, not for enormous business trucks) diesel engine in the F-150. It’s a 3.0-liter turbodiesel V6 making 250 hp at 3,250 rpm and 440 lb-ft of torque at 1,750 rpm. Ford has not yet introduced professional fuel economy quantities nonetheless, but it’s seeking for 30 mpg on the highway. There is certainly no authentic shield protecting against Ford from detuning it marginally for smaller truck work. There are a number of thoughts that avert us from declaring no matter if it’d basically work in the Ranger. The global Ranger features only inline engines, starting from the 2.2-liter Duratorq inline-four to the 3.2-liter inline-five stated higher than. There is certainly no obvious reply still as to regardless of whether a wide dual-overhead camera V6 featuring a 60-diploma lender direction would fit up front. For one, it’s not very clear the global Ranger was designed to fit a V6 from the start. We have no idea if Ford would re-engineer the engine area to enable it to be so. It’d also set it in competition with the larger F-150 with the similar engine, even in the detuned sort.
On the contrary, a V6 of some form appears to be like a very good idea for the United States, and right up until explained to if not we are going to take into consideration it a sturdy risk. Considerably more likely than the Powerstroke V6 is an EcoBoost V6. The 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 engine is functional and adaptable. Even though it offers identical wrapping fears as the Powerstroke V6, getting a different DOHC engine with a 60-level lender perspective, it’s available in a wide range of power outputs now, starting from 315 HP in the aged Edge Sport to 335 hp in some Lincoln solutions. If Ford managed to re-engineer the engine inner compartment to allow for a V6, the 2.7 is everything we visualize can be the ideal fit. Consider if Ford made a decision it necessary a mini-Raptor to enhance its desert-conquering F-150 Raptor. What engine to decide on? You won’t be able to upstage the big Raptor by setting a 3.5-liter EcoBoost into a smaller package. But you could give the 2.7-liter EcoBoost a minor strike, probably up to the 335 hp/380 lb-ft spec. That may very likely provide more than enough of a handy power hit over the likeliest 2.3-liter EcoBoost track to help it become a thing special, and unquestionably it’s going to be doing the job significantly less tough than the 2.3 to make big power.
At the moment? We all know Ford will make the 2.3-liter EcoBoost highly effective more than enough to work perfectly in opposition to the Ranger’s most important competition: Colorado, not to position out the Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier. Over and above that, now we have well-informed guesses, but we must always admit that the Ranger may possibly only be available with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost. If that’s so, we might expect the company would modify a manual transmission to work by using it to satisfy truck customers who wish to change for by themselves. Potentially a beefed-up unit located in the EcoBoost Mustang could work for that goal. Ford is likely to make the most out of this big truck reveal by doling out information and facts in very small pieces. We are going to diligently parse the tidbits and permit you to know as shortly as we will draw in any more results regarding what the Ranger’s future maintains.